Explain what is meant by the ideal pupil Essay

In study halls, numerous educators marked and characterized certain understudies to their moral and scholarly foundations. Becker finished up the regular picture of the Ëœideal understudy as being smart, polite, spurred and for the most part from a working class foundation. Propose three reasons why understudies from the upper social classes and the individuals who have gone to free schools are bound to pick up places at tip top colleges, for example, LSE and Oxbridge in any event, when they have indistinguishable A levels from understudies from state schools One of the fundamental reasons is social capital which is utilized by Marxists to clarify social effects on instructive impacts. Bourdieu and Passeron (1977) recommended that white collar class culture is as important in instructive terms as material riches. Schools are controlled by white collar class and in this manner they will bolster working class understudies whose type of information, qualities and methods of cooperating and imparting are rehearsed and educated by their folks. Common laborers understudies and ethnic minorities anyway are probably going to need characteristics, for example, playing an instrument and being in a band or a symphony or have the option to communicate through the language that white collar class understudies use. This thusly diminishes their odds of achievement. White collar class understudies additionally dont experience the ill effects of material hardship which implies they can figure out how to play numerous instruments and join some extra-curricular exercises which will look better on their applications while common laborers understudies will most likely be unable to manage the cost of all these additional points of interest. Further supporting common laborers and white collar class contrasts in instructive fulfillment, Ball et al (1994) demonstrated another purpose behind why high society understudies performed better than regular workers through his investigations which indicated how working class guardians had the option to play the framework by utilizing their social capital and subsequently guarantee their kids are acknowledged into the best schools and all through their contemplating their folks will keep on utilizing their points of interest, for example, meeting and communicating in and language aptitudes to guarantee their youngsters are in the best classes with the best guides and hence will perform preferred in general over an average workers understudy whose guardians dont have these favorable circumstances thusly the understudies must remain in any place they are put and work harder to accomplish. West and Hind (2003) found that meetings were likewise regularly used to prohibit common laborer s and ethnic minority families or make the procedure increasingly hard for them though white collar class families had the social funding to arrange and make their meeting effective. Another explanation which underpins this hypothesis of distinction in instructive achievement among center and common laborers is Social Capital which

Racism in Australia for Rural Studies- MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Talk about theRacism in Australia for Rural Studies. Answer: Bigotry has gotten uncontrolled in practically all countries over the world. The reason for this type of separation is by all accounts solid simply a similar route as defilement. In a perfect world, it isn't unexpected to see a local of a given nation being abused by the kindred resident because of contrasts in shading, religion and other shifting contemplations. The reality remains that there can't be any type of national advancement without recognizing all individuals and their capacities despite minute contrasts that may exist among them. It isn't once individuals have been slaughtered by their individual comrades because of bigotry; a genuine factor that has seen individuals denies their nations. Specifically, bigotry in Australia has been predominant for a serious long time, and this has slacked the exhibition of the country behind. There are different areas that bigotry is clear in Australia. The territory of wellbeing, Muslim religion, evacuees and a portion of the indigenous Australians keep on recording a noteworthy instance of bigotry therefore signifying the multifaceted nature of living on such grounds. In this way, by leading considerable examinations on types of bigotry clear in Australia will undoubtedly reveal insight into the subject. Unmistakably a portion of the Aboriginal Australians have been encountering an elevated level of separation in light of the fact that not every one of them are white. This case can be clarified by taking a gander at the situation of Belgium where there is a solid mastery of the blacks who are as yet the locals. In this association, Australia neglects to perceive that reality that births are hereditarily and being dark or white has little to do with the nationality of an individual. Additionally, the beginning of the local blacks can be followed back in the pioneer time frame whereby a great deal of movement incorporating various races was experienced prompting settlements that brought forth kids that introduced their homes of starting point (Jonason, 2015,49). Since rules are overseeing the citizenship of Australian individuals, these pioneers were offered the citizenship and this promised them a perpetual remain in Australia. This has achieved numerous assessments about these races, and there have been different recommendations that despite everything don't move in accordance with these individuals. This has prompted disregard these individuals, and the majority of them have been precluded absolute opportunity from claiming development. The circumstance is aggravated by the Fact that independent of the privilege of development, there has been the refusal to practice the option to cast a ballot. This is exasperated by the way that their abuses are exceptionally stretched out up to the wellbeing division. As per the wellbeing report recently discharged, the Australian government saw an expense of eighty million dollars treating the indigenous Australians (Nelson and Dunn, 2013, 263). This figure is viewed as a critical hit to the legislature, and that treatment of such people ought to be controlled to help diminish the expense if conceivable zero rates for the prosperity of others. This has prompted a rise of numerous enemy of prejudice developments that signifi cantly censure segregation for the prosperity of every single Australian resident. The investigations have demonstrated that around thirty-eight districts across Australia recorded significant level of prejudice (Grigg and Manderson, 2016, 49). This related blacks who are accepted to be ignorant and unequipped for conveying quality administrations. These individuals will in general be underestimated, and their physical wellbeing is altogether influenced by this bigotry point of view. The last demonstrate that there is a high death pace of blacks because of unforeseen weakness test and different administrations that mean mental trouble which is the essential driver of passings. The Australian Muslims do confront segregation in the hand of their associate. This stems from the idea that these minorities are the ones liable for fear based oppression over the world. This presumption gets a ton of help from other non-Muslim people group in Australia prompting ignoring of this minority gathering. Additionally, the majority of the Australians can't grasp how their nation can harbor such sort of individuals remembering that the foundation of the country is laid upon Christianity. There have been convictions that partner Muslims with their kindred individuals in Arabian nations, for example, Iraq, Pakistan and other related countries, thusly, naming them as gatecrashers (Forrest, Elias, and Paradies, 2016, 54). In different examples they are named as outsiders; a circumstance that declines their living in their nation of origin. This move is aggravated by the numerous assaults that have been occurring everywhere throughout the world whose patrons are supposed to be Muslim people group. The fact of the matter is there are those Muslims who dread God a similar way other Christian do, and they have the self-recognition that limits them from considering retribution and gore in this way winding up censuring the predominant assaults that have been occurring (Dandy and Pe-Pua, 2015, 347). Regardless of that, it is apparent that nobody appears to comprehend the reality of the situation in this way in a roundabout way supporting assaults by the Islamic gatherings because of the open act of dismissing them which animate the requirement for them to trade fury with brutality. The non-Islamic Australians don't recognize the Islamic siblings and sister, and most now and again, they will in general express dread and distress that raises as the mixing uplifts (Gilbert, 2013, 85). To put it plainly, Islamic culture is ineffectively evaluated in Australia consequently dismissing the need to lecture fellowship, a significant variable in the acknowledgment of har mony and national development. The evacuees are not heartily invited in Australia.The truth concerning the displaced people is that the United Nations Organization and the Commonwealth bunches assume the liability of taking care of and taking the general consideration for exiles (Nelson, 2015, 353). They are included settlers and the occupants who will in general be uprooted because of common war. The Australian people group generously neglects to perceive these displaced people as a vital part to their turn of events. This brings up the issue of how the Australian economy will understand the full advantage of work as the capable evacuees are not tried in the work showcase yet they can convey quality work worth affirmation. Rather, these exiles are seen as the significant gathering harboring fatal ailments, and their collaboration with others is limited (Forrest and Dunn, 2013, 6). This is improved by the solid security set up to screen the working of these people due to the additional accept that they may be conc ealing lawbreakers who usually assault the country. This may be valid, yet hypotheses without premise can't go on without serious consequences. Moreover, it is unfortunate to make forecasts that are summed up in this manner making the entire thought obscure and questionable. This type of dismissal turns into a wellspring of mental pressure and mental torment that enormously impacts the soundness of these casualties. The truth is that the administration of Australia contrarily influences the administrations arrangement to the exiles albeit independent of existing smooth collaboration of Commonwealth gathering and national government (Hickey, 2016, 733). In uncommon cases, these individual are conceded option to practice their vote based rights accordingly holding them as hostages; a circumstance that is against the desires of United Nations rules and standards. As per the examination completed in 2009 enveloping the indigenous and transient understudies, it was recorded that bigotry is as yet pervasive even in schools (Fozdar, 2015, 91). The outcomes showed that the greater part of the vagrant understudies were profoundly victimized more than the indigenous students. This keeps on indicating the sort of weight the displaced people are confronted with in the hand of hardhearted Australians who don't wish to stretch out dependability to the non-local regular citizens. Convincingly, the essential types of bigotry occurring in Australia have been fundamentally broke down. The Muslims, blacks, and the transients are believed to have been the chief focuses of separation. Obviously, Australia is a country supplied with important assets that have not been completely contributed because of the work requirements. On the off chance that at all prejudice can be brought to a stop, the financial objectives of the country can be accomplished because of the participation surprisingly regardless of their shading religion and nationality. Quickly, bigotry is a sad practice that ought to be censured for the prosperity everything being equal. References Dandy, J. what's more, Pe-Pua, R., 2015. The displaced person experience of social attachment in Australia: Exploring the jobs of prejudice, intercultural contact, and the media.Journal of Immigrant Refugee Studies,13(4), pp.339-357. Forrest, J. what's more, Dunn, K., 2013. Social assorted variety, racialisation and the experience of prejudice in provincial Australia: the South Australian case.Journal of Rural Studies,30, pp.1-9. Forrest, J., Elias, A. also, Paradies, Y., 2016. Points of view on the topography of narrow mindedness: Racist mentalities and experience of prejudice in Melbourne, Australia.Geoforum,70, pp.51-59. Fozdar, F., 2015, January. Changing a White Australia: Issues of prejudice and migration, by Laksiri Jayasuriya. InAnthropological Forum(Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 90-91). Routledge. Gilbert, K., 2013.Because a white man'll never do it. HarperCollins Australia.83-86 Grigg, K. furthermore, Manderson, L., 2016. The Australian Racism, Acceptance, and Cultural-Ethnocentrism Scale (RACES): thing reaction hypothesis findings.International diary for value in health,15(1), 49-53 Hickey, S.D., 2016. They state Im not an ordinary Blackfella: Experiences of prejudice and ontological uncertainty in urban Australia.Journal of Sociology,52(4), pp.725-740. Jonason, P.K., 2015. How dim character qualities and discernments meet up to anticipate bigotry in Australia.Personality and Individual Differences,72, pp.47-51. Nelson, J. furthermore, Dunn, K.M., 2013. Prejudice and hostile to racism.'For Those Whove Come Across the Seas...': Austra

Letters From A War Zone :: essays research papers

"Letters from a War Zone" manages the debate among people prohibiting sex entertainment. In this paper there are numerous solid individual perspectives on sex entertainment what's more, the ruthlessness of ladies in pornography. People have been at war for a long time along these lines. I concur with prohibiting erotic entertainment since sex entertainment draws men into affronting ladies. This paper drives me crazy since it shows another piece of life that is truly not recognized. It appears to be practical to me in light of the fact that numerous ladies in life are stood up to with sex at an early age and become powerless. The extraordinary thing that contacts me is the means by which ladies don't have a decision, particularly when it comes down to sex. Defenselessness is one of a lady's shortcomings. Sex entertainment is corrupting to ladies when it is constrained upon them. On the off chance that sex were accomplished for joy or in light of the fact that the ladies needed to, it would not be as awful. That is what number of ladies are assaulted, executed or lose their certainty. Ladies in sex entertainment were regularly whores at a certain point. Because of insights, more than a large portion of the ladies in a sex-related callings have been explicitly mishandled, attacked or assaulted at once during their lies. The statement expressed in this exposition that truly hits home is "Made in South America where life is cheap." I, as a Hispanic, am horribly affronted by this announcement. This articulation essentially says that South America has numerous lowlives', and that anything can transpire in light of the fact that life there is worth practically nothing. For instance the ladies of South America are utilized in Snuff movies and in express photos. Snuff is a film that comprises of a lady being explicitly bothered, assaulted, and slaughtered. In a considerable lot of these movies/photographs the ladies are brutalized to where their bosoms are disassembled and their bodies are peed on after they are assaulted and murdered. There are photos in which ladies' bosoms are hammered in rodent traps, their vaginas are full with blades, firearms, and even glass, and afterward they are pack slammed, beaten, and tormented. Snuff movies are as a rule made in South America in light of the fact that, as said in the announcement above, life isn't worth a lot there. "If you are going to hurt a ladies in the United States make certain to photo it" is a dubious proclamation utilized in this exposition. Its implies that if you have killed, hurt, or mishandled a lady it is OK, as long you have snapped a photo. The photo communicates a point of view, holy in a free society. When these picture/films are being taken the lady is compelled to grin. This will make the image/films secured by the constitution,

The Problem of Identity in Chuck Palahniuks Fight Club - Literature Essay Samples

Chuck Palahniuk’s Fight Club is an unprecedented novel which is particularly concerned with the problem of forging secure identities in the face of modern challenges: consumerism, capitalism, emasculating white-collar work, an absence of fathers, and an absence of historical distinctiveness. The text’s protagonist is a figure so lost in the ennui of modern life that he is driven to creating an unruly alter-ego who has the courage to act out his unconscious desires, and who promises deliverance from his state of anonymity. The disastrous results that come about speak volumes about the post-modern world in which the story is set; a world which borrows heavily from our own. This essay will explore the various causes of the ‘identity problem’ as offered by Palahniuk, as well as the various solutions his characters desperately implement. It will be argued that identity in modern times, as conceived by Fight Club, is a problem that is as pressing as it is unso lvable.One of Fight Club’s main concerns in relation to the problem of identity is the notion of consumerism, and by extension capitalism, commodification and the endless quest for self-improvement. Early in the story, the narrator recognises the futility of acquisition as a basis for identity. His home is a high-rise condominium, ‘a sort of filing cabinet for young professionals.’ This metaphor aptly describes both the stark physical reality of the condominium, along with the psychological effects of dislocation that it occasions. Relating the incident of his home’s bombing, he later comments on his feelings towards its internal contents: You buy furniture. You tell yourself, this is the last sofa I will ever need in my life†¦.then for a couple of years you’re satisfied that no matter what goes wrong, at least you’ve got your sofa. The right set of dishes. The perfect bed. The drapes. The rug. Then you’re trapped in your lo vely nest, and the things you used to own, now they own you. (p.44) The narrator’s acute awareness of his generation’s debilitating obsession with consumption grows alongside his relationship with the rogue anti-consumerist, Tyler (who is, of course, only another side of the narrator’s own personality). In a passage which is as depressing as it is amusing, the narrator catalogues all of the IKEA items he owned that were destroyed by the bomb Tyler deployed. The specificity of his descriptions of the items, coupled with the number that he owns, underscores the extent of his obsession. This is an affliction which, he observes, afflicts many others: ‘I wasn’t the only slave to my nesting instinct’ (p. 43). Significantly, he prefaces this very specific list of items with: ‘We all have the same’†¦(p.43). Not only is his generation preoccupied with acquiring items that, as he explained, ‘end up owning [them]’, but the items themselves (besides the options for various colours and combinations) are not even unique; everyone essentially owns identical things. The sheer amount of colours and designs they are available in, coupled with the narrator’s uncanny ability to recite these colours and designs, emphasise the extent of this multinational corporation’s success; a success made possible by a global obsession with appearances, consumption, convenience, timesaving and moneymaking all at the expense of depth, originality and substance. With the help of Tyler, the narrator realises that the perpetual processes of self-improvement and acquisition are doomed, and incapable of producing a stable or genuine sense of identity. Oh Tyler! he exclaims, Deliver me from Swedish furniture. Deliver me from clever art. May I never be content. May I never be perfect (p.46). In saying this prayer, the narrator demonstrates his rejection of society’s preoccupation with superficiality; a pr eoccupation Palahniuk shows to be as chronic as it is hopeless. As Tyler and the narrator discover, the problem of consumerism is not confined to their own generation and class; it exists in the upper echelons of society as well. This is perhaps demonstrated most poignantly at the catering job where Tyler torments the wealthy hostess of a glamorous party one in which titans and their gigantic wives drink barrels of champagne and bellow at each other wearing diamonds bigger than [the narrator] feels (p.81) by claiming to have urinated in one of her perfume bottles. What was supposed to be a mischievous statement against flashy wealth quickly becomes a pitiful and ugly scene in which the initially poised hostess (‘Madam’) is left drunken and bloodied on the bathroom floor, her perfume bottles shattered and her mood utterly broken. Accusing her husband of having an affair with a guest, declaring that she’s ‘tired of all the people they call their friendsà ¢â‚¬â„¢ (p.83) and distraught about the inflammatory act, the once-immaculate woman, who seemed to have it all, is revealed to have very little. With this scene, and others like it, Palahniuk paints a picture of a bleak world in which people continually try (and fail) to base their identities on the items they own and the image they project, rather than on the person they are or the things they believe. It is a world in which ‘there is no you and there is no me’ (p.164) only empty shells; contrived exteriors; structures without insides. In Palahniuk’s text, not only are capitalism and commodification damaging to the individual’s conception of self, but also to the workplace and, by extension to the individuals who attempt to carve out identities within the workplace. The narrator of the story works as an ‘insurance adjustor’ – a role in which he robotically applies a mathematical algorithm in order to determine whether a product r ecall or a payout of damages would be more expedient for his company. This process demonstrates the ways in which work has succumbed to the logic of profit maximization and cost minimisation at the expense of moral or ethical considerations regarding the humans involved – in this case, those affected by the malfunction of goods produced by the company’s clients. With this process, people are dehumanised; they are reduced to their bodily forms as figures of profit or liability. But this dehumanisation is not only inflicted on the general public by the company, it is also inflicted on the workers employed to carry out their objectives, such as the narrator. This is perhaps best highlighted in the early sections of the story in which the narrator describes the monotony of the air travel he must endure in aid of his work. He states: ‘You wake up at Air Harbour International†¦You wake up at O’Hare. You wake up at La Guardia. You wake up at Loganâ€⠄¢ (p.25). This repetition is carried on throughout the chapter, with many other airports that he ‘wakes up at’ inserted intermittently between dialogue and descriptions. There is no sense of personal agency conveyed in this repeated line, rather, he is a pawn who is endlessly transported between cities at the whim of anonymous superiors, only learning where he is upon waking. But perhaps the most striking disadvantage of the work he undertakes, made evident through an absence of description more than anything else, is the loneliness it engenders. At no point in the sections set in his workplace do we learn the names of his colleagues (or indeed, anything about his colleagues). There is no sense of community alluded to, not even one based on a mutual hate for the work they must undertake. The only exchanges that are detailed are those between the narrator and his boss – whose name, significantly, we never learn. The workplace he describes is not even one in which stress provides a focus – instead, he seems to float in and out, completely apathetic about the company that appears to be equally apathetic towards him. This sense of apathy is not confined to the insurance job in which the narrator works. When Tyler gets fired from his job as a projectionist, for example, he displays an attitude which indicates he has been treated in much the same way. Addressing his boss, he states: I am trash and shit and crazy to you and this whole fucking world†¦You don’t care where I live or how I feel, or what I eat or how I feed my kids or how I pay the doctor if I get sick, and yes I am stupid and bored and weak, but I am still your responsibility. (p.115) These matter-of-fact lines describe the way in which workers are not treated as real people with individual personalities and experiences, but rather as machines that companies utilise to their own ends. This is perhaps best exemplified in the boss’s innocuous response to Tyler: â€Å"We appreciate your contribution to our success† (p. 113). Just like the narrator (unsurprisingly – since they are one and the same), Tyler realises that he is wholly disposable in the eyes of his superiors, who make profit their focus at the expense of their employers’ lives. Just as the narrator and Tyler find consumption an inadequate source of self- fulfilment and identity, so too do they find the tedious jobs in which they are forced to work and which have been corrupted capitalist imperatives completely insufficient. In these jobs, they are not people. Rather, they are human resources. The crisis of identity occurring in post-modern societies and explored in Fight Club is one in which men face particular challenges. The futile consumerism previously mentioned, coupled with the exploitative nature of work, not only dehumanise but also emasculate since men have an innate desire for control, and since both result in a loss of control. The story describes a world in which young men are ill-prepared for the lives ahead of them and at a complete loss as to the purpose of their existence. Palahniuk is at pains to locate this problem beyond the realms of consumerism and work. To this end, the issue of fathers is one which is given repeated attention. The narrator explains that the rebellious Tyler ‘never knew his father’ (p.49). The narrator knew his father ‘for about six years’ (p.50), but remembers nothing. His adult dealings with his absent father have revolved around the irregular long-distance phone calls he makes when arrives at crossroads in his life, asking ‘Now what?’ His father is never able to deliver, meaning the narrator is consigned to a life of restless floating. But what is the deeper significance of the absence of fathers? At one point, the narrator states ‘What you see at fight club is a generation of men raised by women’ (p.50) and later, the mechanic (who is essentially parroting Tyler) explains â€Å"If you’re male and you’re Christian and living in America, your father is your model for God. And if you never know your father, if your father bails out or dies or is never at home, what do you believe about God?† (p.141). This is perhaps the most important line of the whole text, as it encapsulates both the cause and the nature of the problem which the fight clubs seek to redress, as well as pointing to the possible repercussions of the problem. Without male role models, young men are unable to construct complete visions of who they are, because they do not know where they have come from. Further, they are unable to fully conceptualise daunting questions about the world around them, the meaning of existence (‘what [they] believe about God) and, hence, what they believe about themselves. Without fathers, these men do not know who they are. An extension of the problem of fathers within the te xt is the problem of history. The men of fight club, particularly the narrator, have an ambivalent attitude towards history. On one hand, they are resentful about their role as the inheritors of a deeply troubled past. This is exemplified in the narrator’s rant which begins ‘for thousands of years, human beings had screwed up and trashed and crapped on this planet, and now history expected me to clean up after everyone’ (p.124). He is overwhelmed by the extent of the world’s problems, angered that he is expected to fix them, and frustrated by his inability to do so. Therefore, he sees destruction as the only solution not merely destruction of problematic places and things (eg. endangered pandas, damaged rainforests), but of culture and history itself, declaring that he wants to ‘burn the Louvre†¦and wipe [his] ass with the Mona Lisa’ (p. 124). Echoing Tyler, he literally wants to destroy history, to ‘blast the world free of ità ¢â‚¬â„¢ (p.124) in an attempt to relieve his frustration regarding his inability to solve its problems. But there is another aspect of the narrator’s and his peers’ attitude towards history. Not only do they wish to ‘destroy’ it so that it can no longer torment them, but they also wish to control it two desires which appear to be in opposition. Feeling they are ‘God’s middle children’ (p.141), with no special place in history, but rather in a perpetual postmodern present that is bereft of distinctiveness, they want to carve out a ‘special place’ through Project Mayhem – the anarchic group which grew out of fight club, and which was a series of escalating disruptions aimed at businesses, consumer consumption, and the financial system itself. By reaping havoc on society – perhaps even dying in the process – the men of Project Mayhem hope to redress their feelings of insignificance occasioned by their abandonment, their emasculation and their unfortunate place in history. As Tyler explains: ‘getting Gods attention for being bad was better than getting no attention at all. Maybe because Gods hate is better than his indifference’ ( p.141). This line reveals the extent of the narrator’s (and his peers’) sense of worthlessness and anonymity in a world in which they are ‘the crap and the salves of history’ (p.123), all too aware of the extent of the world’s problems, yet at a loss as to solutions. Just as significant as the many causes of unstable identities which this text explores (consumerism, commodification, dehumanisation through work, abandonment, a lack of historical distinctiveness) are the comments it makes on the solutions adopted to redress these problematic identities. While at first effective, the cancer support groups which the narrator attends in an attempt to cathartically cure his insomnia eventually prove ineffectiv e, because he feels exposed by the fact that Marla knows he is a fake. Both his and Marla’s sick obsession with attending these groups underscores the extent of their desperation, their loneliness and their complete lack of direction in their depressing lives. They do not know who they are, and in order to address that problem, they masquerade as people they are not. In doing so, they are granted an insight into death and, paradoxically, this is the only thing that helps them feel alive. The fight clubs are similar in that they strip the narrator of his (unstable) identity, reducing him to an anonymous body, and allowing him to feel more alive by bringing him closer to death in this case, through masochistic violence. They also provide a sense of community, which is an essential precondition for the formation of a stable identity. Yet, unsurprisingly, they too are eventually unable to fully deliver him from his listless, lost state. Project Mayhem, an extension of the fight clubs, is equally ineffectual in bringing about a stable sense of self for the narrator. While its goal is to ‘blast’ its members free of history, it ends up doing anything but. Project Mayhem eventually becomes a recapitulation of the familiar ideologies of history – most notably fascism and communism. The ‘space monkey’ members become sadistic slaves and clones, they shave their heads, burn off their fingerprints, worship the dictatorial Tyler and essentially become instruments to the movement’s disturbing collective will. Project Mayhem thus fails to secure new, individualistic identities for its members in which they are free from the bonds of history; instead, it offers them only the same positions of enslavement which they experience in their regular lives, and which they tried (and failed) to overcome through fight club. The narrative culmination of Project Mayhem, and of the story itself, in which the narrator stands atop of t he Parker-Morris Building with a gun in his mouth, is essentially a return to the masochism of the fight clubs. This circularity reflects the futility of the task of ‘reaching’ or achieving a stable sense of identity in the perpetual present of the dizzying post-modern world. Fight Club’s notion of identity becomes, in essence, a continual ‘waiting’ for an identity. â€Å"There isn’t a you and a me anymore† (p.164), Tyler explains, and with these words, he encapsulates every aspect of the problem of identity which this story takes as its focus. The dehumanising effects of self-improvement, commodification and of capitalist-based professions make people slaves to trends and to corporations that care little about their welfare. They are no longer people ( a ‘you’ or a ‘me’), rather, they are anonymous figures of consumption and production who are forced to perpetuate the capitalist system. An absence of fathe rs renders these people confused as to their origins, their purpose and their place in the world, and an absence of historical distinctiveness leaves them lost as to their significance. The insomniac narrator attempting to make sense of himself in this world is driven to everything from creating another personality, to faking cancer, pissing in perfume, stealing human fat, vandalising film reels, blowing up buildings, brawling in fight clubs†¦ to establishing a terroristic revolutionary organisation hell-bent on murder and martyrdom. The radicalness of his efforts demonstrates both the extent of the problems he and his peers face in relation to identity, and the failure of his efforts (coupled with the story’s depressing denouement) demonstrate the futility of finding solutions as long as our post-modern world remains unchanged. BIBLIOGRAPHYPalahniuk, Chuck, Fight Cub, (New York: 1996).

Why Do People Come America For Corn Dogs - 1332 Words

Why do people come to America? For Corn Dogs? The Statue of Liberty? To be deported? If you were to ask someone who immigrated to America why they came, they would not respond with any of those answers. People come to America for a chance at the â€Å"American Dream†, but what exactly is the â€Å"American Dream†? The American Dream is the belief that everyone has an equal opportunity to achieve success through hard work and determination. Through this, there would be little to no class system permanently fixing someone to a definite status, meaning it would allow the status of the person to move up or down freely. So if a poor person were to work hard enough, they could move up and be rich essentially letting them live better lives. This idea†¦show more content†¦The poor (the unfit) were nothing in comparison to the rich (the fit) and were only made to be used and worked by the rich (the factory owners, foremen, foreladies and brothel owners). He also shows t he separation of the classes and rigidity within the class system, something that was supposedly so fluid or almost non existing in America. Sinclair uses a series of rhetoric to expose the crookedness within America and it’s industries. In the quote â€Å"He had heard people say that it was a free country - but what did that mean? He found that here, precisely as in Russia, there were rich men who owned everything; and if one who could not find any work, was not the hunger he began to feel the same sort of hunger?† Sinclair uses a series of questions to make the audience see that there is Capitalism in the â€Å"free country† (America) just as much as there was in the countries where the immigrants came from (Russia). He is showing the fallacy within the mindset toward America, trying to show that it is just as bad here or even worse than where most of the immigrants originated from. Just like in their native countries the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor (Capitalism), there was no difference between the countries, something immigrants found out the hard way. In the quote â€Å"The forelady had to come up to a certain standard herself, and could not stop for sick people - The fact that Mary had been there so long

Romeo and Juliet is a play written by Sir William Shakespeare Essay Example For Students

Romeo and Juliet is a play written by Sir William Shakespeare Essay Romeo and Juliet is a play written by Sir William Shakespeare at the end of the sixteenth century. He wrote this in the Elizabethan period when Queen Elizabeth I ruled England but the exact date is unknown. At this time plays and puns (word play) were common as they were the only form of entertainment. Like all other plays at this time Shakespeares had no female actors. It was seen to be inappropriate for a lady to act, therefore male actors were used instead and had to play the parts of women as well as men. Shakespeare was influenced by other writers; for his Romeo and Juliet play he used an old Italian tale called The Tragicall History of Roemeus and Juliet, written by Arthur Brooke. In this play Juliet was sixteen but Shakespeare decided to reduce her age to thirteen although it was unusual for a girl of this age to get married. In Romeo and Juliet Juliet is forced to have an arranged marriage but she has already fallen in love with Romeo. At the time Romeo and Juliet was written, arranged marriages were common between families of the same social status. To refuse to get married would be an insult and an embarrassment on your family. Baz Luhrmann tries to modernise Shakespeares play a lot. He does this so his new audience can relate to certain things in the play as being believable. For example in Luhrmanns film he uses a more appropriate age for Juliet. If he were to keep Juliet at thirteen the audience of today would think it was strange and the play just wouldnt work. He also uses modern props like cars and guns. In the original, Shakespeare written play, swords are used as weapons. So that the audience of today can relate to this Baz Luhrmann uses guns with the word Sword written on them. This allows him to use roughly the same script. For example, at the beginning of the film one character says Give me my long sword meaning give me my gun. The story of Romeo and Juliet is set in an Italian city called Verona where two chief families, the Montagues and the Capulets, are sworn enemies. However one day two teenagers, each from opposing families, accidentally meet and immediately fall in love. Their names are Romeo and Juliet. A Capulet called Tybalt later kills Romeos best friend, Mercutio. Romeo chases after him and kills him in revenge. Romeo is then banished from Verona and the only way for them to keep seeing each other is to run away together. To do this Juliet decided to fake her death. She sent a letter to Romeo telling him she was still alive and to come and get her but Romeo never got it. Juliets supposed death was too much for Romeo. He went to Juliets body and poisoned himself leaving Juliet to wake up and find him dead. Juliet couldnt live without him either. Distraught and confused she too killed herself. The death of these two lovers ended the Montague and Capulets rivalry and proved that true love could not be changed. Romeo and Juliet starts with a prologue. A prologue introduces a play, poem or novel before the main piece begins. In the Elizabethan period, when Romeo and Juliet was written, the prologue was read out to calm the audience down and make them ready to watch the play. The prologue of this play is written in the form of a sonnet. Sonnets are a rhyming piece that has fourteen lines and follows a unique rhythm (a b a b c d c d e f e f g g). Its metre is called Iambic Pentameter. Just like the one in the prologue, sonnets are usually poems about love. The sonnet in Romeo and Juliet tells the audience what is going to happen in the end. The purpose of this is not to give away the story but to make the audience want to watch on. In Baz Luhrmanns film version he uses a TV report to show whats going to happen. I am going to explore how Shakespeare uses language to convey the relationship between Romeo and Juliet in his play Romeo and Juliet and how Baz Luhrmann represents this in his film version. I am also going to look at how Shakespeare uses different techniques to display this. At the end of Act 1 Scene 4 Romeo is talking to Mercutio. He talks about how he can sense something bad is going to happen and mentions his future death. He says Some consequence yet hanging in the stars; He is talking about astrology and how the stars are showing him his fate. Astrology was very popular at the time this play was written and Shakespeare uses the idea a lot in his plays. By Romeo saying By some vile forfeit of untimely death shows that he can tell his death will come. The next thing he says is But He that hath the steerage of my course direct my sail! we know that he is referring to God because Shakespeare uses a capital H. He is saying that God controls what is going to happen to him and when he says Direct my sail! he is asking God to direct him to his fate. Religion was an important part of life in the Elizabethan period. Shakespeare uses religious phrases and ideas throughout Romeo and Juliet. Remarkable changes EssayBaz Luhrmann however, interprets this scene very differently in his film. Juliet comes down the balcony and walks alongside her swimming pool. This prop is used in the same way as the fish tank. Its relaxing colour and soft waves make the moment more romantic. When Romeo appears from the darkness Juliet screams and the two of them fall in the pool. Luhrmann then introduces all new parts and props into the play. A security guard is shown, watching Juliet on the CCTV. The guard hears her scream and comes out to check on her. At this moment Romeo hides beneath the water until the guard has gone. This is another way that Luhrmann uses new props to modernise the play. In Act 3 Scene 5 Romeo and Juliet are on the balcony. Romeo talks of how he must go but Juliet tries to persuade him to stay. She eventually wins the persuasion but Romeo is forced to leave when Juliets nurse enters the room. Juliet says to Romeo Some say the lark and loathed toad changed eyes; O now I would they had changed voices too. There was a myth that the toad and lark had exchanged eyes but Juliet is saying to Romeo that they should have changed voices instead because the horrible crouch of a toad is more suited to the lark that separates them. At this point the nurse enters and Romeo is forced to leave in a hurry. Baz Luhrmann uses props and colours to make the moment feel more romantic. His choice of prop in this scene is a white bed sheet, which is wrapped around Romeo and Juliet. The white sheet is put over their heads so it is like no one is there but them. The sheet blocks out the rest of the world and makes the moment more emotional. Baz Luhrmann decided to cut part of the script out to make it shorter. With the use of the white sheet less speech is needed. Luhrmann does this a lot in his film. He replaces dialog with props and colours. Act 5 Scene 3 is the scene in which Romeo and Juliet kill themselves in confusion. When Romeo finds out Juliet is dead, he decides to poison himself, as he cannot live without her. Before doing so he says Will I set up my everlasting rest. By saying this he is asking whether it will be is full and final commitment. He conducts a long speech in which he speaks his final words. Before drinking down the poison he say Heres to my love! which means he is doing this for her. Juliet then wakes to find Romeos body. Devastated she says a small speech in which she says Haply some poison yet doth hang on, to make me die with a restorative. Thy lips are warm. She is saying that maybe they have been poisoned. By saying that she will die in restorative she is saying that her kiss will cure her life and restore her to Romeo. Romeos speech is much longer than Juliets because he has had more time to grieve and has planned his death whereas Juliet killed herself in panic without thinking before she d id so. At the beginning of this scene Romeo kills Paris. This is cut out from Baz Luhrmanns film so the storyline, of how Romeo and Juliet killed themselves, can be concentrated on. Luhrmann also uses props like candles and a giant church hall. This could not have been done in Shakespeares time. Shakespeare uses a wide range of techniques to convey the relationship between Romeo and Juliet. Metaphors, similes and personifications are all used to show a particular emotion or feeling. Courtly love and religious phrases are also used to express the relationship between Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare used these techniques to their full potential. Baz Luhrmann also used his own techniques that worked well to produce a wider range of emotions through choices of props and colour.

Essay Topics For Your Survival Guide

Essay Topics For Your Survival GuideThe survival essay topics are an essential part of a college essay. Not only do they provide the framework for your writing, but they also provide for the hook that will draw in your reader to your final product. All of the essay topics for a survival guide contain a central theme and a set of proper subjects.A survival guide doesn't focus on the topic of your college essay in itself. You should always approach each essay topic from a unique angle that can serve as a hook to keep your reader reading. And what better way to attract your reader than by providing the hook of what you're writing about? There are no two ways about it; the survival essay topics are there to keep the reader engaged and interested in your survivalist guide.The survival subject is almost always food or survival. When this subject comes up in the survival essay topics, it's usually for a reason. Perhaps you are writing a survival guide for an elite group of people, perhaps y ou are writing to inform the general public of a threat or to encourage people to do something about the situation. Regardless of the reason, the survival subject is relevant. It is the subject of the survival essay topics and often, it is the base for a great article.By using the survival subject, you will quickly realize that the 'hook' is also in the topic. You need to turn around the survival subject into a bait that your reader will want to read your survival guide. The survival bait will give your reader something to read to keep them reading. It is easy to do this, and your readers will appreciate your ability to capture their attention.The survival guide is no exception. You can make it personal, humorous, or look at the society in general. Whatever the hook is for your survival guide, you must make sure that the subject is relevant to your survival guide.The survival essay topics don't have to be long either. They can be extremely short, if you feel that you are writing a s mall-scale document that is being used for a class project. If you feel that you need to work a little harder, you can certainly do so, but remember, a survival guide isn't meant to take up a lot of time.As a survival guide, your essay will be focused on survival. The survival essay topics can be as short as three pages long, or they can be as long as sixty pages. It all depends on the type of information that you are providing. The key is to keep your readers wanting more.Survival is always the most important factor when it comes to survival guides. If you are thinking about writing a survival guide for yourself, or for a friend or family member, make sure to make the survival subject the focal point of your survival guide.